|
Title: Toasted is better? Post by: Gizmo on November 04, 2004, 10:24:36 pm http://www.montrealracing.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157682
Title: Re: Toasted is better? Post by: Rob on November 05, 2004, 12:28:13 am wow... it is odd that they didnt have a sprinkler system.. or at least a functioning sprinkler system.. It would suck if there sprinklers just didnt work.. then the Insurance would just say tough luck....
could be some good parts left.. Title: Re: Toasted is better? Post by: WillEV on November 05, 2004, 09:46:40 am Wow that sucks!
Title: Re: Toasted is better? Post by: dguy on November 05, 2004, 11:20:08 am Ouch. :o :'(
Title: Re: Toasted is better? Post by: aaron88 on November 05, 2004, 06:08:02 pm A lot of companies opt to not install a sprinkler system because they cause too much damage in the case of a false alarm. Water damage is often not covered by an insurer but fire damage is. It’s strange and I don’t know what the policy is there but there are a lot of computer buildings in Ottawa that don’t have a sprinkler because of the damage that they would cause to the computers. In some cases they opt for a much more expensive non water systems. This was obviously not one of those cases.
I wonder what there insurance is going to cost now? Aaron . |